The public outcry against match bonus is noticeable. Whilst I am not against using match bonus in principle (in some cases it is useful) I do understand that a lot of people may feel it is unnecessary. On the other hand, for most of us it is the only way to maybe remotely stand a chance against vastly superior teams.
Instead of just demanding it's removal it would be useful to see some alternative suggestions and I will raise one here:
How about creating scope in the finance house to select players individually who will receive a bonus (say 50% boost) but their salaries will be doubled (or quadrupled or whatever)? In that way if you wish your whole team to receive a boost you will have to pay an awful lot more in salaries or have the ability to reduce it by only applying the boost to a handful of players.
Instead of just demanding it's removal it would be useful to see some alternative suggestions and I will raise one here:
How about creating scope in the finance house to select players individually who will receive a bonus (say 50% boost) but their salaries will be doubled (or quadrupled or whatever)? In that way if you wish your whole team to receive a boost you will have to pay an awful lot more in salaries or have the ability to reduce it by only applying the boost to a handful of players.