Matt Grieve-Milne :

Thanks Mate, for replying. I get that people beat teams in friendly matches than get smashed in a competitive game, that isn't always because of my though, strat building bonus stars, ghost tactics or not the best players in starting team at time but overall mb is the cause.

The big guns have worked hard to get where they are today, but you don't throw stones when you live in a glass house, by that I mean taking away the mn before other changes are made will create a bigger monopoly for them, down in the bottom leagues people are quoting due to this, we just had a guild challenge where only 1 of the opposition challenged us, then checking all the teams in the guild only a couple had been actively playing.

How many players do you have in your squad Leicester? I've been part of a big time guild and I left yes it was due to some childish people and they ain't all the same I realise that so sorry if it came across that way.

In no way in black and white did I say I was unhappy, if I was I would say I'm not happy. So I came to a decision the developers won't change the game they are not listening to the game players and people have been insulting there nationality which is probably not helping lol I going to gevelop a new game and currently this game should be called the 6 nations as its being played like teams in the comp lol

Then why don't everyone brain storm together to make a fairer game instead of only crying out for a change that effects generally the big guns? That's my only gripe.

Matt Grieve-Milne :

Sorry if I come across I'm attacking individual guilds I'm not, and I don't propose any of this because of a bad experience in a guild. I'mmaking the big guns aware that by them complaining only about one issue will create a new inbalance in the game and I'm sticking up for the little guys to be honest as they are becoming less and less active then give up because they can't make head ways in the game. In another gvg we just played only 2 of the opposition actually played there 2 matches meaning 8 guys ain't playing (maybe they are away but not all 8) easy money and auction dollars but I like a challenge.

I believe it the guilds where ranked on ability or guild wins it would create more competitive guilds and new guilds would form from guys wanting to create their own to become the best this would create more competition would also incourage passing on of knowledge to others. Maybe the leader of a guild receive some sort of extra bonus for gvg wins likewise for right hand man, experienced and newbies. That would have guys wanting to move up the rankings in there guild to obtain more bonus's or go off and join another guild. Say 1 leader 4 right hand sides, and experienced and newbies no set number? Why not even have each guild challenge each other to define there ranking in there own gulid?

Also if the one sidedness of mb is removed then strategy buildings would become a bigger emphasis and that would create a imbalance in the game again and that would generally only favour the big guns and then everyone would start crying foul again.

Some of the big guns should listen to the little guys while there are still some left as you'll soon kill the game and find playing against ghost sides boring and brainstorm to make a even competitive playing field. Make a detailed report to send to the developers that would still appeal to them business wise then they may start listening if they don't they in time will lose a profitable game, the other approach is to contact Apple or google and raise your concerns as they also make money from supplying this game to us for them....