Black Monks :
I don't think you will be banned for this. The issue in the past was that people were called cheaters, you are saying it shouldn't be done and is underhand. While those are similar the difference is enough. I know people on both sides of this debate and I am personally against the use of this tactic. Funny thing is that I disagree with a lot of the folks on the no unfair advantage side who themselves are willing to use mb in gvg which I personally think is also on the unfair advantage side. So, I agree this should stop, I think you spoke this very respectfully and thus should not/will not be banned.
I don't think you will be banned for this. The issue in the past was that people were called cheaters, you are saying it shouldn't be done and is underhand. While those are similar the difference is enough. I know people on both sides of this debate and I am personally against the use of this tactic. Funny thing is that I disagree with a lot of the folks on the no unfair advantage side who themselves are willing to use mb in gvg which I personally think is also on the unfair advantage side. So, I agree this should stop, I think you spoke this very respectfully and thus should not/will not be banned.
Thanks BM. I agree with you on mb, I never use it in GvG as it is an unfair advantage to the challenging side. However where it is available to both sides then I think it is fair game to use it. Though having said that I prefer not to.
I believe the teams using the underhand tactics should be removed from the game. As Bluemooners says it's easy to spot these teams the results will be 28-28 or 35-35 both teams will be online and change their tactics around the 40 min mark.
Unfortunately all the teams I have seen using these tactics also sport the same flag doing a dis-service to that country.