Report Match Fixing Update

Guest C9MJYD: You are wrong! Way wrong! It is only "Match Fixing" if both parties have agreed to do so beforehand. In GCs there is no way to agree a "Match Fix" beforehand and any team can use any strategy they like. Milking in GCs is just a way for every Guild member to get BOTH games played and maximise much needed income for building upgrades.
1 person can still match fix DHSFP to ensure a loss on purpose, you dont need 2 people to fix a match, I can give plenty of examples in sport where 1 person or 1 team have fixed to lose on purpose which is what cow games are, the stronger team losing on purpose
So you are wrong saying you need 2 to fix when categorically you do not.
Tell that to a lawyer you naive person lol.

As for milking in GCs it benefits both the stronger and the weaker teams (both get Gate Money) so there really is nothing unfair about it.
Naive? Oh my!!! I cannot believe what you are responding with, to save yourself further embarrassment I will stop commenting now and agree that you are right. Thanks
No comment on milking in GCs being fair for both teams then? Just going to hide away now just as you are hiding your real identity under a Guest account?
I see both sides here. As a matter of cause I do not use a cash cow. They are two different matter though, no guild is going to throw a gc, and the aim in gc is to win the challenge and secure max recruiting points and progress up the guild chart.
Ok, so let's advocate dropping GC's down to 1 game per person. This way you have 1 chance to beat an opponent, if you win then great, if not, ah well. Maybe up the gate money or drop the amount items in the sports shop cost and drop the amount needed for upgrades etc.

Keep the conversation positive everyone, no need to fall out and name call.

Kind regards,

La Cagnannaise Exposed.
The gc is fine I personally never seen a whole gc fixed, cash cows yes, but who benefits with this system? Everyone I suppose. Who loses no one.
I haven't called anyone names...yet. I called our friend above "naive" is all and that is far from name calling.

As for 1 game per. team per. GC, I don't think that would go down well across the board. Nothing wrong with the way it is just now and also NOTHING wrong with milking. MOST Guilds use this depending upon who they are playing. It's not just limited to a few and the tiny percentage that do not use it I feel sorry for as their Guilds will progress much more slowly with their teams being unable to afford as many building upgrades as the ones who do use it.